Connect with us

News

Judiciary: Here are the facts about Tuju’s Dari property case

Published

on

The Judiciary has issued a statement clarifying issues surrounding court rulings in a property dispute between former Cabinet Secretary Raphael Tuju and auctioneers arising from an alleged default on a Sh2.2 billion bank loan.

Through spokesperson Paul Ndemo, the Judiciary said the statement was issued in response to the public interest the case has generated and the ongoing debate surrounding the matter.

On March 9, 2026, the High Court dismissed Tuju’s bid to stop the sale of his Dari Limited property, sparking a dramatic series of events, including the alleged night eviction of his family and tenants from Tamarind Karen/Dari Business Park and Entim Sidai Wellness Sanctuary by masked police officers in unmarked police vehicles.

Tuju said he will not give up on the property and obtained a court order allowing him to appeal the High Court ruling.

Below is the full statement from the Judiciary on the matter:

The Judiciary notes the public interest and commentary following the delivery of the ruling in Dari Limited & Raphael Tuju vs Garam Investment Auctioneers, Knight Frank Valuers Ltd & Others (HCCOMM/E636/2024) on March 9, 2026.

Further to our statement of March 27, 2025, and in keeping with our constitutional commitment to transparency, accountability, and public understanding of judicial processes, we issue this statement to clarify the context and legal issues in the matter.

The dispute arises from efforts by lenders and associated parties to realise securities over two properties owned by the plaintiffs following a long-standing debt obligation.

The plaintiffs moved to the High Court seeking, among other reliefs, injunctive orders to stop the auction and transfer of the properties pending the determination of the suit.

At the initial stage, the court granted interim orders to preserve the properties pending inter parties hearing.

The defendants subsequently challenged the jurisdiction of the court and the propriety of the proceedings, seeking to set aside those interim orders and to strike out the suit.

Upon consideration of the pleadings, affidavits and submissions, the court found that the dispute has a protracted litigation history spanning multiple jurisdictions and levels of courts.

This includes a final judgment issued by the High Court of Justice in England and Wales in 2019 requiring repayment of over $15 million under a financing agreement, recognition and enforcement of that judgment by the Kenyan High Court in 2020, affirmation by the Court of Appeal in 2023, and the Supreme Court’s refusal to grant interim relief to halt enforcement.

The court further noted that earlier attempts by the plaintiffs to obtain similar injunctive relief had already been considered and dismissed by the High court in 2024.

Against this background, the court held that the plaintiffs’ application for injunction reproduced, in substance and effect, issues that had already been litigated and conclusively determined.

The application was therefore barred by the doctrine of res judicata (the same issues had already been decided by competent courts).

The court emphasised that the validity of the underlying financial agreement, the amount owed, and the lender’s right to realise the secured properties had already been settled by the High Court of Justice in England and Wales in 2019.

It further found that the reintroduction of substantially similar claims, albeit framed in constitutional terms, amounted to an attempt to re-open concluded matters and thus constituted an abuse of the court process.

The court also reiterated that it cannot sit on appeal over decisions of courts of concurrent or superior jurisdiction, nor can it re-litigate matters that have been finally determined.

In light of these findings, the court allowed the defendants’ applications challenging the proceedings, struck out the plaintiffs amended plaint and the application for injunction and discharged all interim orders that had previously restrained the realisation of the properties.

The plaintiffs have since lodged an appeal before the Court of Appeal.

Accordingly, in order to safeguard the integrity of the ongoing judicial process and uphold the rule of law, we urge all parties to exercise restraint and allow the appellate court to determine the matter without parallel discourse that may prejudice or undermine the due administration of justice-STAR.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

National Assembly dismisses claims Sacco Bill is being rushed through Parliament

Published

on

The National Assembly has dismissed reports that the Sacco Societies (Amendment) Bill, 2025, is being rushed through Parliament, saying the proposed law is still undergoing public participation.

Through infographics shared on Facebook on Tuesday, July 14, 2026, Parliament said misleading information had been circulating online about the Bill, formally known as the Sacco Societies (Amendment) Bill, National Assembly Bill No. 32 of 2025.

Bill was published in June 2025

The National Assembly said the Bill was published on June 30, 2025, and had remained under consideration for more than 12 months.

It rejected suggestions that lawmakers were fast-tracking the proposed amendments without allowing enough time for scrutiny.

According to Parliament, the lengthy period between the publication of the Bill and its current consideration shows that it is not being rushed.

Bill currently before the National Assembly committee

The Sacco Societies Amendment Bill is currently before the National Assembly’s Departmental Committee on Trade, Industry and Cooperatives.

The committee is conducting public participation and receiving views from members of the public and other stakeholders.

The submissions are expected to help the committee assess the proposed amendments before presenting its recommendations to the National Assembly.

What happens after public participation?

After the public participation process is concluded, the committee will prepare a report containing its findings and recommendations.

Parliament said the views submitted by members of the public and stakeholders could inform further amendments to the Bill.

The proposed legislation will then proceed to the National Assembly for consideration by MPs.

This means the Bill has not yet completed the legislative process and could still be amended based on the submissions received during public participation.

Bill will be forwarded to Senate

The National Assembly also clarified that the Bill will not proceed directly for presidential assent after being passed by MPs.

Because the proposed legislation concerns county governments, it will be forwarded to the Senate for consideration in accordance with the Constitution.

The Senate will be required to consider the Bill before it can complete the parliamentary process and be presented for presidential assent.

Parliament urged members of the public to rely on verified information about the Sacco Societies Amendment Bill instead of unconfirmed reports circulating online-PeopleDaily.Digital.

Continue Reading

News

Digital house-hunting platform bets on technology to reshape Nairobi’s rental market

Published

on

NAIROBI, Kenya, July 14 – A growing shift towards digital property searches is changing how Kenyans find rental homes, with real estate technology platform Reemio positioning itself as a solution to longstanding challenges.

This included fraudulent listings, costly house searches and limited market transparency.

As younger, tech-savvy consumers turn to online platforms to make purchasing decisions, the company says digitizing the rental process could improve efficiency for both tenants and landlords while lowering transaction costs.

“Our niche is to solve the problem of house hunting and also bring trust into that process. We use technology to connect renters and landlords,” said Kimani.

Kimani said the platform seeks to address inefficiencies that have traditionally made house hunting expensive and time-consuming.

Instead of physically visiting multiple properties, users can browse verified listings, take virtual tours, compare amenities and access information on additional costs such as water charges, electricity bills and service fees before scheduling physical viewings.

Beyond improving convenience for tenants, Reemio argues that technology can help landlords reduce marketing costs, shorten vacancy periods and reach a wider pool of prospective tenants, including Kenyans living abroad.

The company says its platform also generates market data that can help property owners and developers better understand evolving consumer preferences, although its long-term impact will depend on wider adoption of digital property platforms and continued investment in trustworthy online real estate marketplaces-Capitalfm.co.ke.

Continue Reading

News

ORPP edges two parties closer to joining Kenya’s political arena

Published

on

The Office of the Registrar of Political Parties (ORPP) has issued a notice for the provisional registration of two proposed political parties, opening a seven-day window for members of the public to lodge objections.

In a notice published by the Registrar of Political Parties and Chief Executive Officer J.C. Lorionokou, the ORPP announced that the Social Democratic Party of Kenya (SDP) and the People’s Alternative Voice (PAV) are in the process of being provisionally registered under Section 5(2)(a) of the Political Parties Act.

The ORPP, a State office established under Section 33 of the Political Parties Act and Article 260 of the Constitution, said its mandate includes registering and regulating political parties as well as administering the Political Parties Fund.

According to the notice, the Social Democratic Party of Kenya (SDP) has adopted pink, white and sky blue as its official party colours, with the slogan “Change – Mageuzi.” The party’s symbol is the acronym SDP enclosed inside a circle.

The party’s listed founder members are Nyangong’ Duncan Nyumbah, Omwandasi Jared Dishon and Kinyua Mary Wacuka.

The founders of PAV are listed as Odenyo John Fitzgerald Elly, Nyando Rachel Mmboga and Ali Hussein Kiplangat.

The Registrar said particulars of the two proposed political parties have been published on the ORPP website to facilitate public scrutiny as required by law.

Any person wishing to oppose the provisional registration of either party has seven days from the date of publication of the notice to submit objections either in writing or in person to the Office of the Registrar of Political Parties at Lion Place, Fourth Floor, Waiyaki Way at Karuna Close, Nairobi.

The provisional registration marks the first step in the legal process of establishing a political party in Kenya.

Kenya has 91 fully registered political parties. The ORPP’s updated register indicates that, as of January 2026, there were 91 parties that had met the legal requirements for full registration under the Political Parties Act-STAR.

Continue Reading

Trending