“If I had disobeyed my mother and gone to New York, what might have happened to me?” asks Gláucia Fekete.
In 2004, as a 16-year-old living in the Brazilian countryside, she was taking her first steps in the modelling world.
She says French modelling agent Jean-Luc Brunel visited her family home, to persuade her mother to let her go to a modelling contest in Ecuador. He later killed himself in prison, accused of rape, sexual assault and recruiting girls for the late US financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Back then, they didn’t know who Brunel was; they had been introduced by a famous Brazilian scout.
A BBC News Brasil investigation has found evidence that Brunel used modelling agencies linked to him at the time to actively seek out young women and girls from South America for Epstein, and to arrange visas for them to travel to the US.
Another Brazilian woman, who says she had a relationship with Epstein, showed the BBC her US visa. It named one of Brunel’s agencies as her sponsor, even though she says she never did any modelling work for him and the travel documents were arranged solely so that she could visit Epstein.
Gláucia’s mother was suspicious of Brunel, but he seemed “very charming” and eventually she agreed her daughter could go to Ecuador without her. The teenager travelled with Brunel’s team to Guayaquil for the Models New Generation competition. At the time, local newspapers reported that the participants were between 15 and 19 years old.
Gláucia says the competition passed without any major problems, although she grew suspicious when she was not allowed to contact her family.
Another contestant, from Western Europe, who was 16 at the time, remembers how Brunel’s behaviour struck her as odd. She asked not to be named, so we are referring to her as Laura.
“It was weird how he behaved and was always hanging out with the young Brazilian girls… He was behaving like a clown and only hanging out with quite young girls,” she says.
Laura believes that while the competition was “legit” and well organised, “he knew exactly which girls were vulnerable”.
“He seemed to control their finances,” she says. “The girls from Brazil and East European countries seemed to be the prime target.”
Gláucia says that towards the end of the trip, Brunel offered to fly her to New York “to take part in shows” with all expenses paid. At that point they had to contact her mother, Barbara, for permission.
Barbara’s response: “No. Not a chance.
“They were only looking for children, minors,” Barbara says. “Unfortunately they found my daughter.”
She forbade Gláucia from any more involvement in modelling and cut ties with Brunel’s network.
“It really was a narrow escape,” says Gláucia.
In files released by the US government, BBC News Brasil found records showing that Epstein was in Guayaquil on 24 and 25 August 2004, at the same time as the final of the modelling competition. We also saw documents indicating that at least one model under 16 who attended the event flew on Epstein’s plane at least twice in the same year.
Gláucia says that looking back, “without knowing it, I was in the middle of that storm”.
“My mother saved me.”
‘He chose me’
Another Brazilian woman, whom we are calling Ana to protect her identity, says that Brunel and his modelling business were instrumental in facilitating her relationship with Epstein.
Ana was initially recruited by a Brazilian woman in the early 2000s in São Paulo.
Ana’s account, corroborated by documents reviewed by the BBC and cross-checked against US Department of Justice records, shows how Brunel helped to arrange US visas for Brazilians.
Ana says she left her hometown in southern Brazil after being promised modelling opportunities in São Paulo by a woman who was based there.
She says that on arrival, the woman took her documents and told her she now owed money for travel and photos. Ana says she soon realised there was no modelling work.
“She was a madam. Before I knew it, she was pimping me out.”
One of the clients was Jeffrey Epstein, says Ana.
She describes how, a few weeks after her 18th birthday, the woman took her to the home of a prominent businessman in São Paulo. There, she says, she heard him describe Epstein as “the king of the world” and say: “He likes younger girls.”
A few days later, she says she and two other women were sent to a luxury hotel in São Paulo, where Epstein would choose one of them. “He chose me,” she says.
Ana says she went to a room with Epstein, where he asked her to remove her clothes. “His thing was watching me while he touched himself. It was disgusting, but of all evils, the lesser one,” she says.
US Department of Justice files, including emails and flight records, place Epstein in Brazil at that time.
She says he invited her to a party in the city a few days later, which is where she first met Brunel, and the modelling agent soon became instrumental in arranging a US visa for her.
She adds that during the party, Epstein told her that he was going to Paris the next day and that he had already arranged for her to go with him.
The visa route
Describing the trip to France, she says: “He [Epstein] would give me $300 (£225). I would go out for a walk and give him the change, but he would tell me to keep the money. He would test me and leave money in my room, and then I would give it back to him, and he would say I could keep it.”
She says Epstein then told her that he had arranged for Brunel to hire her at his modelling agency in New York, and that the madam had handed over her documents.
Ana showed the BBC her passport, containing a US business visa with an annotation naming the agency that Brunel set up in the US, Karin Models of America.
Ana says she never worked for Karin Models of America but was told the paperwork would support her travel to the US, and the only reason for the visa was to visit Epstein.
Her statement matches other documents. Court records and US Department of Justice files indicate that Brunel used his agency, first called Karin Models of America, and later MC2 in America, to attract girls from several countries, including minors.
The same records include testimony from a former MC2 employee in the US saying Epstein paid for visas which Brunel’s agency in the US arranged. Epstein had provided financial backing when Brunel set up MC2 in the US.
There has never been any suggestion that any agency other than those managed and controlled by Brunel in the US were involved in any wrongdoing.
Before he died, Brunel denied he had done anything wrong. His lawyers said he had been “crushed” by the allegations, and blamed a “media-judicial system”.
Ana says that over the course of about four months, she travelled to the US and France with Epstein, who was “affectionate” towards her.
She describes how, during that time, he paid for some English lessons.
Ana says her visa was cancelled in Miami after US authorities questioned who was paying for her work and whether she was receiving money in the United States.
She says she had travelled to the country at least six times to spend time with Epstein before the visa was cancelled.
She says she went to his private island in the US Virgin Islands and thought he considered her his girlfriend, until she found him in bed with someone else. “Until then, it hadn’t sunk in that he did this with many girls,” she says.
“On several occasions he would tell me to leave the house to do something – go to a museum, go to classes. I don’t know if anything happened that he didn’t want me to see… He liked younger girls and being surrounded by them.”
She adds that she had sex with him once, and “he liked sleeping, spooning, cuddling and having his feet massaged”.
She says Epstein once told her that Brunel had asked to sleep with her but he refused saying: “I didn’t let him because you’re mine.”
Ana says she didn’t know whether to feel “grateful or more terrified” and after that, she felt Brunel was “like a wolf looking at a lamb, always with devouring eyes, both for other girls and me”.
Ana says that for the first meeting at the hotel and the trip to Paris, there was an agreement that Epstein would pay the Brazilian madam $10,000 (£7,400) in cash.
She says Epstein paid only part of that amount and that she overheard phone calls in which the woman pressured him to pay the remainder.
This account is consistent with testimony given in 2010 to a court in Florida by a former accountant at MC2 in the US – Brunel’s model agency – and cited in the Epstein files. The accountant said there was a Brazilian woman who arranged girls for Epstein and Brunel in Brazil and was angry over a debt.
According to Ana, contact with the Brazilian woman who recruited her faded after she released her documents, but Ana continued to see Epstein.
Ana says that after the visa was cancelled, Epstein offered to get her a green card to live in the US but she declined so she could stay close to her family in Brazil.
Investigation into recruitment network
Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPF) opened an investigation in February into whether there was a recruitment network in Brazil linked to Epstein.
Federal prosecutor Cinthia Gabriela Borges from the national anti-trafficking unit told the BBC that she wanted to speak to women who had contact with Epstein to work out how the system operated. The women themselves are not the target of the inquiry.
What happened to Ana and others could be considered human trafficking for sexual exploitation, according to labour inspector and researcher Maurício Krepsky. He says that this type of crime may not be subject to a statute of limitations, so Brazilians involved could still be held accountable.
Gláucia is grateful that she had a mother who said no. And after years of trying to make sense of what happened to her, Ana feels fortunate to have left Epstein’s circle and rebuilt her life.
“I think I was lucky, but I feel for the other women,” she says.
If you, or someone you know, have been affected by the issues raised in this story, details of organisations offering information and support are available at BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/actionline/. –STAR.
The National Assembly has dismissed reports that the Sacco Societies (Amendment) Bill, 2025, is being rushed through Parliament, saying the proposed law is still undergoing public participation.
Through infographics shared on Facebook on Tuesday, July 14, 2026, Parliament said misleading information had been circulating online about the Bill, formally known as the Sacco Societies (Amendment) Bill, National Assembly Bill No. 32 of 2025.
“Lately, there’s been a lot of misleading information circulating online about the Sacco Societies (Amendment) Bill. Let’s cut through the propaganda with the actual facts,” Parliament said.
Bill was published in June 2025
The National Assembly said the Bill was published on June 30, 2025, and had remained under consideration for more than 12 months.
It rejected suggestions that lawmakers were fast-tracking the proposed amendments without allowing enough time for scrutiny.
According to Parliament, the lengthy period between the publication of the Bill and its current consideration shows that it is not being rushed.
Bill currently before the National Assembly committee
The Sacco Societies Amendment Bill is currently before the National Assembly’s Departmental Committee on Trade, Industry and Cooperatives.
The committee is conducting public participation and receiving views from members of the public and other stakeholders.
The submissions are expected to help the committee assess the proposed amendments before presenting its recommendations to the National Assembly.
What happens after public participation?
After the public participation process is concluded, the committee will prepare a report containing its findings and recommendations.
Parliament said the views submitted by members of the public and stakeholders could inform further amendments to the Bill.
The proposed legislation will then proceed to the National Assembly for consideration by MPs.
This means the Bill has not yet completed the legislative process and could still be amended based on the submissions received during public participation.
Bill will be forwarded to Senate
The National Assembly also clarified that the Bill will not proceed directly for presidential assent after being passed by MPs.
Because the proposed legislation concerns county governments, it will be forwarded to the Senate for consideration in accordance with the Constitution.
The Senate will be required to consider the Bill before it can complete the parliamentary process and be presented for presidential assent.
Parliament urged members of the public to rely on verified information about the Sacco Societies Amendment Bill instead of unconfirmed reports circulating online-PeopleDaily.Digital.
NAIROBI, Kenya, July 14 – A growing shift towards digital property searches is changing how Kenyans find rental homes, with real estate technology platform Reemio positioning itself as a solution to longstanding challenges.
This included fraudulent listings, costly house searches and limited market transparency.
As younger, tech-savvy consumers turn to online platforms to make purchasing decisions, the company says digitizing the rental process could improve efficiency for both tenants and landlords while lowering transaction costs.
Reemio Head of Business Njoki Kimani said the platform was created to eliminate many of the frustrations associated with conventional house hunting by connecting verified landlords and renters through a digital marketplace.
“Our niche is to solve the problem of house hunting and also bring trust into that process. We use technology to connect renters and landlords,” said Kimani.
Kimani said the platform seeks to address inefficiencies that have traditionally made house hunting expensive and time-consuming.
Instead of physically visiting multiple properties, users can browse verified listings, take virtual tours, compare amenities and access information on additional costs such as water charges, electricity bills and service fees before scheduling physical viewings.
“The digital space has become the next logical place for house hunting. We’re removing the stress of moving from one house to another physically while helping people avoid misleading listings and unnecessary costs.”
Beyond improving convenience for tenants, Reemio argues that technology can help landlords reduce marketing costs, shorten vacancy periods and reach a wider pool of prospective tenants, including Kenyans living abroad.
The company says its platform also generates market data that can help property owners and developers better understand evolving consumer preferences, although its long-term impact will depend on wider adoption of digital property platforms and continued investment in trustworthy online real estate marketplaces-Capitalfm.co.ke.
The Office of the Registrar of Political Parties (ORPP) has issued a notice for the provisional registration of two proposed political parties, opening a seven-day window for members of the public to lodge objections.
In a notice published by the Registrar of Political Parties and Chief Executive Officer J.C. Lorionokou, the ORPP announced that the Social Democratic Party of Kenya (SDP) and the People’s Alternative Voice (PAV) are in the process of being provisionally registered under Section 5(2)(a) of the Political Parties Act.
The ORPP, a State office established under Section 33 of the Political Parties Act and Article 260 of the Constitution, said its mandate includes registering and regulating political parties as well as administering the Political Parties Fund.
According to the notice, the Social Democratic Party of Kenya (SDP) has adopted pink, white and sky blue as its official party colours, with the slogan “Change – Mageuzi.” The party’s symbol is the acronym SDP enclosed inside a circle.
The party’s listed founder members are Nyangong’ Duncan Nyumbah, Omwandasi Jared Dishon and Kinyua Mary Wacuka.
The second proposed party, People’s Alternative Voice (PAV), has adopted purple, gold and white as its official colours. Its party symbol is a shofar, while its slogan is “Sauti Mbadala-Haki, Usawa na Maendeleo.”
The founders of PAV are listed as Odenyo John Fitzgerald Elly, Nyando Rachel Mmboga and Ali Hussein Kiplangat.
The Registrar said particulars of the two proposed political parties have been published on the ORPP website to facilitate public scrutiny as required by law.
Any person wishing to oppose the provisional registration of either party has seven days from the date of publication of the notice to submit objections either in writing or in person to the Office of the Registrar of Political Parties at Lion Place, Fourth Floor, Waiyaki Way at Karuna Close, Nairobi.
The provisional registration marks the first step in the legal process of establishing a political party in Kenya.
After meeting the statutory requirements set out in the Political Parties Act, including demonstrating national character and fulfilling membership thresholds, the parties may apply for full registration, which grants them legal recognition to field candidates in elections and access benefits available to registered political parties.
Kenya has 91 fully registered political parties. The ORPP’s updated register indicates that, as of January 2026, there were 91 parties that had met the legal requirements for full registration under the Political Parties Act-STAR.